How electoral systems affect MPs ’ positions ∗

نویسندگان

  • Simon Hug
  • Danielle Martin
چکیده

The question how different electoral systems affect the represention of voters in parliaments has been a thorny issue for a considerable time. While some research suggests that first-past-the-posts systems should lead to a closer correspondence between the preferences of the electoral district’s median voter and of its representative, other work concludes that in proportional representation systems, especially with open lists, candidates have an incentive to cultivate a strong personal vote. To study this question we take advantage of two peculiarities of the Swiss political system, namely that in the same chamber of the parliament some members are elected in PRand some in plurality elections and that direct democratic instruments play an important role. The second element, given that for a series of votes in parliament voters have to decide on the same issue, allows us to estimate the policy positions of MPs and the median voter of each electoral district in the same policy space. We find that MPs elected in plurality elections are on average closer to their respective median voter. In PR districts, MPs are much more widely spread around the median voters’ preferences. ∗This study has been realized using the data collected in the “Living in Switzerland” project, conducted by the Swiss Household Panel (SHP), which is based at the Swiss Foundation for Research in Social Sciences FORS, University of Lausanne. The project is financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation. It also employs data from the Swiss election studies (http: //www.selects.ch). The paper draws in part on the master’s thesis of Martin (2008) and an earlier version has been presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto (September 3-6, 2009). Extremely helpful comments by Karen Long Jusko, as well as the help of the Swiss Parliamentsdienste and especially Ernst Firschknecht and Andreas Sidler, who provided the bulk of the empirical data used here and helped us using it, are gratefully appreciated. The Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No 100012111909) provided generous funding. † Département de science politique, Faculté des sciences économiques et sociales; Université de Genève; 40 Bd du Pont d’Arve; 1211 Genève 4; Switzerland; phone ++41 22 379 83 78; email: [email protected]

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Political Knowledge and Issue Voting among the Latino Electorate

How informed is a Latino vote? Though recent scholarship has improved our understanding of Latino political participation, partisanship, and policy preferences, relatively little is known about how Hispanics make electoral decisions. In this effort, we evaluate the role policy issues, candidate affect, and symbolism play in the electoral choices of Latino voters. In particular, we are intereste...

متن کامل

1 Theoretical Comparisons of Electoral Systems

Elements of an economic theory of political institutions are introduced. A variety of electoral systems are reviewed. Cox's threshold is shown to measure incentives for diversity and specialization of candidates' positions, when the number of serious candidates is given. Duverger's law and its generalizations are discussed, to predict the number of serious candidates. Duverger's law is interpre...

متن کامل

Electoral system design in new democracies

Elections in the wake of dramatic transitions from authoritarian regimes to democracy may confront voters with choices that are unattractive or bewildering, or both. This paper examines the conditions that produce tractable sets of party options for voters, presents cross-national data on the choice sets and competitiveness in elections after dramatic transitions, and examines how the electoral...

متن کامل

Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: The Effects of Primary Processes

Electoral institutions can affect the voting behavior of legislators who are elected through those institutions. In this article, the authors apply social network theory to study patterns of legislative choices under different primary election systems, and this approach leads the authors to study how electoral institutions affect legislative behavior differently than most previous research—that...

متن کامل

Voting for Parties or for Candidates: Do Electoral Institutions Make a Difference?

Little is known about how electoral institutions systematically affect the level of incumbency advantage in legislative elections. In this paper, I analyze the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) data to put the U.S. case in a comparative context and explore how electoral institutions aid or preclude incumbents from gaining an advantage. In particular, I study whether electoral system...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010